China’s lockdown cut some air pollution, but not all

The February lockdown in China due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused a drop in some types of air pollution, but not others, according to new research.

The near-total mobility shutdown resulted in a striking drop in nitrogen oxide, a gas that comes mainly from tailpipes and is one component of smog, the researchers found.

Learning how behavior shifts due to the COVID-19 pandemic affect air quality is of immediate importance, since the virus attacks human lungs. The event also offers a way for Earth scientists to study how the atmosphere responds to sudden changes in emissions.

“…the immediate climate-related impacts from the shutdown are negligible.”

“During the February 2020 shutdowns in China there was a large and rapid decline in nitrogen dioxide—an air pollutant largely associated with transportation—that is unprecedented in the satellite record,” says Michael Diamond, a doctoral student in atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington and lead author of the study, published in Geophysical Research Letters.

This satellite image, which was NASA’s Image of the Day for March 2, 2020, compares nitrogen dioxide over China in early January and mid-February 2020. The difference shows the dramatic effects of reduced traffic during the February lockdown. The new study calculates the size of this effect, accounting for other factors that would affect air quality. (Credit: NASA)

“On the other hand, our analysis shows no dramatic changes in the total amount of aerosol particles in the atmosphere, or in cloud properties. This suggests the immediate climate-related impacts from the shutdown are negligible,” Diamond says.

While other studies have already looked at air quality during the pandemic, this is the first to take a more rigorous view, using all 15 years of satellite data. It uses a statistical method that compares observations from February 2020 to what researchers would have expected without the pandemic.

“Early in the quarantine period, there was some discussion that the Earth was healing itself, but some of those claims, like the dolphins in Venice, have turned out to be false,” Diamond says. “The scientific community was interested in documenting what changes actually occurred.”

‘Pretty bad smog events’

The authors used data from NASA’s Ozone Monitoring Instrument, or OMI, and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, or MODIS, which have monitored the skies since 2005. These instruments use different wavelengths to monitor quantities like nitrogen oxides, airborne particulates, and clouds.

In addition to using a longer record, the model accounted for the expected effects of China’s environmental policies.

“China passed a clean air law in 2013, and ever since you can see that pollution is going down. So just for that reason, we might expect that the pollution in 2020 would be lower than in 2019,” Diamond says.

The analysis also accounted for this past February’s relatively hot and humid weather in China, which made gases more likely to react and form airborne particles.

“You still had some pretty bad smog events happening in the Beijing region, even during the lockdown,” Diamond says.

50% drop in nitrogen dioxide

The authors also considered the atmospheric effects of the Chinese New Year, which is celebrated in either late January or early February and generates both higher particulates from fireworks and lower traffic emissions from people being on holiday.

After accounting for all of these factors, the pandemic’s effect on nitrogen dioxide was a drop of 50% compared to what would be expected for February 2020, a drop unlike any other seen in the satellite observations.

“The difference we see is more than twice as large a drop as anything we saw in the record from 2005 to 2019, including from the 2008 Great Recession. In the statistics of atmospheric science, that’s a giant signal. It is rare to see anything that striking,” Diamond says.

While the change in nitrogen dioxide was dramatic, other quantities showed no significant change. Fine particulate matter, which has a bigger impact on human health and the climate, hardly changed over China during the shutdown.

Passenger transportation virtually disappeared during the lockdown, but economic data show that heavy industry and energy production stayed fairly constant, Diamond says.

Clouds and air pollution

The fact that some quantities did not change is, for atmospheric scientists, a significant result in itself. Clouds, which pollution affects, and have the biggest effect on climate, also showed no significant changes.

Coauthor Rob Wood, a professor of atmospheric sciences, and Diamond collaborated on a recent publication that detected cloud changes due to pollution from ships. That study showed that to detect the effect on clouds researchers need many years of data.

“Our study suggests that since we found little change in particulate pollution due to COVID-19, we are unlikely to see any change in the clouds unless pollution changes over a longer time period due to a prolonged economic downturn,” Wood says.

Overall, the findings agree with a recent study showing that nitrogen dioxide dropped in several American cities during the peak quarantine period, but levels of other pollutants stayed fairly constant.

The response suggests that future clean air policies can’t focus only on transportation emissions.

“When you’re crafting these clean air strategies, you’re probably not going to be able to attack just one sector; you’ll have to address several sectors at once,” Diamond says.

NASA funded the work.

Source: University of Washington

The post China’s lockdown cut some air pollution, but not all appeared first on Futurity.

from Futurity https://ift.tt/2YAya2A